Order (Auto)June 5, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Fernando Navarro Gutierrez

✓

Topic · hard data

Aclaracion Sentencia T-112/02

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela

Improcedencia de aclaración

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-112/02 presentada por el Director Nacional de Estupefacientes, toda vez que la competencia para aclarar las sentencias de esta Corporación, habida cuenta de que la norma legal sobre el particular (Art. 21 del Decreto 2067 de 1991), fue declarada inexequible por la propia Corte en la Sentencia C-113/93.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-112 del 15 de febrero de 2002, presentada por Gabriel Merchan Benavides, en su condicion de Director Nacional de Estupefacientes.
SEGUNDO. Publiquese conjuntamente con la Sentencia T-112 de 2002.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

✓

Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

Reporting justice

✓

Jaime Córdoba Triviño

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites4

T-112/02Derecho A La Igualdad Debido Proceso Administrativo Y Propiedad. Administracion Bienes Durante Procesos De Extincion De Dominio. Via De Hecho. Predios Ubicados En Caldas Y Cundinamarca. Incora. Negada.T-941/01Debido Proceso. Derecho A La Libertad Y A La Igualdad. No Se Surtio Notificación De La Providencia De Cierre De La Investigacion. Los Internos Se Encontraban En Desobediencia Civil. Inexistencia De Perjuicio Irremediable. Negada.C-113/93Dec. 2067/91. Art. 21 Incs. 2 Y 4 Y Art. 24. Efectos De Las Sentencias De Constitucionalidad. Aclaracion De Sentencias. Inexequibles.T-522/92Derechos De Los Internos. Derecho A La Salud. Concedida.

Cited by0

No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.